Posts Tagged financial fraud

Bank Of America’s Criminal Deception of U.S. Treasury on Bailout

 BoA bailout

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Illustration from Deesillustration.com

 

The Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Congressman Edopholus Towns (D -Brooklyn, N.Y.) is leading the investigation into whether executives for Bank of America made misrepresentations based on false claims to the government in December 2008 regarding it’s agreed takeover of Merrill Lynch in order to receive significant taxpayer bailouts.

The committee has acquired thousands of documents that included handwritten notes from lawyers representing BoA in it’s takeover of Merrill Lynch that indicated the bank’s claim of a “Material Adverse Change” in circumstances regarding the takeover was unfounded.  Nonetheless, it appears executives for the bank used this legal clause as a veiled threat to withdraw from the takeover in order to to persuade the U.S. Treasury and then Secretary Hank Paulson to give them more bailout money.  If true, this would be tantamount to extortion – which is a criminal offense – let alone fraudulent misrepresentation.

BofA spokesman Larry Di Rita said that BoA’s actions “were based on our desire to make the best decision for our shareholders . . .”

This self-serving statement is utterly laughable in light of U.S. District Court Judge Jed A. Rakoff’s take on BoA’s behavior in the suit brought by the SEC against the bank.  BoA screwed it’s shareholders by intentionally withholding information regarding the Merrill Lynch bonuses and then blaming their lawyers.  Now we learn the high likelihood that these same executives ignored the advice of their lawyers and wilfully mislead the U.S. Treasury when they looked to the government for financial bailouts.  Why BoA is allowed to perpetuate this ongoing charade defies logic and reason. 

These men are financial terrorists! 

When will they be made to answer for their crimes against the American people?

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Insider’s Pathetic Attempt to Defend Insider Trading

insider_trading 

 

 

 

 

 

 

When the news broke last Friday regarding the arrests of several individuals in a very high-profile insider trading scheme, you could almost hear the nervous musings of the investment community belittling the government’s action.  It seems as if every time someone gets caught trading on illegally-gotten investment information, the hair-splitting amoral posturing begins.

Yes, there is a thin line separating legitimate research and insider trading.

Yet, there is always at least one shameless industry shill who is willing to rationalize why insider trading laws are ostensibly unjust.  Here is a snippet of what Jim Woods of InvestorPlace had to say last Friday in defense of insider trading:

“In most cases, insiders are those who have either worked hard to achieve a particular standing in a company, or who have the capital resources to uncover specialized information about companies.”

Translation:  1) I am better and/or smarter than you, so I am entitled to take advantage of everyone else; 2) I have the industry contacts, and sufficient financial and/or information resources to give someone the incentive to take enormous advantage of an opportunity for us to soley profit from trading in certain stocks long before the information becomes public knowledge.

Yes, Jim Woods.  Your stance only further validates the perception of individual investors in the inherent unfairness of financial markets that they have rightly concluded are heavily gamed in favor of those who work within the industry.  Now just think . . .  if all of those investors exit the market because of this fundamental inequity, you will not have anyone to sell your stock to in order to secure your illegal profit.

Guess you never thought of it in that context, did you?

, , , , , ,

No Comments

Congress Ignores the Financial Trevails of Small Business

 small business

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As was noted in yesterday’s blog, Wall Street Boys collect fat bonuses for moving money around the world at the speed of light, creating nothing of real value, while still continuing to intentionally deceive the government and shareholders about their business transactions with no substantive consequences.  Even Federal District Court Judge Jed A. Rakoff obviously wondered why the SEC was not investigating and prosecuting apparent criminally fraudulent behavior?  A $33 million fine is meaningless for Bank of America – especially if it’s executives who committed the fraud are not going to pay for it, either financially or by criminal punishment (as usual, the shareholders, bank customers, and tax payers are all going to “take it in the shorts” on this one). 

Now today it is reported that the major financial credit rating agencies – Standard and Poor, Moody’s, etc. – are still intentionally inflating the ratings of the securities of the Wall Street firms who pay them fees.   Anyone familiar with the term “Conflict of Interest”?  While testifying yesterday before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, former Moody’s managing director, Eric Kolchinsky, asserted that his firm was criminally deceiving investors.   This was one of the principle underlying causes of last years financial meltdown, and yet they are they are doing it again? 

MEMO TO: Attorney General Eric Holder . . .

Where is the deterrence?!?!?

Meanwhile, honest, hardworking small business people try to fund retirement plans for themselves and their employees through the trusting hands of financial advisers, insurance companies, and former IRS agents.  Thanks to Congress, and even the IRS in some cases, that trust was sorely misplaced by a number of small business owners.  The mere fact that a business or individual may have inadvertantly failed to file one form, or even IF the existence of the retirement plan was reported in a business tax return, but not a personal return - any violation triggers enormous penalties and fines.   Some of these honest business people even relied upon IRS “determination letters”  that tacitly give initial approval to their plans. 

Guess What?  WRONG!  According to a complex set of tax rules and formulas established by Congress, if the IRS later determines that the plan was not in compliance, you are subject to penalties and fines for any number of “violations”.   One would think it reasonable that if you’re intentions are honest, that your reliance on expertise is reasonably placed, and there is obviously no intention to commit fraud, you will not be driven to bankruptcy.  You would be WRONG AGAIN!

What is most galling is the fact that the fines and penalties are not even commensurate with the violations.   It’s like giving the Death Penalty for speeding on the highway.  Congress takes the view that Wall Street is TBTF (To Big To Fail) even if they fraudulently screw things up, but your small business can be allowed to go bankrupt if you make an honest mistake.

The powerful Wall Street firms and financial institutions, their executive management, their rating agencies, and the minions who do their bidding (lawyers, lobbyists and politicians) suffer insignificant consequences for their criminally fraudulent  behavior, primarily by pouring millions of dollars into the political campaigns of the most powerful Democrats and Republicans sitting on Congressional Committees overseeing Banking, Finance and Business Regulation.

Meanwhile small businesses, which generate approximately 50% of the business income in this country, are treated like step-children.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Bank of America Execs Still Duckin’ and Dodging Responsibility

Shawshank Redemption Prison yard [my lawyer fucked me]

 

 

 

 

 

 

“What’ch you in here for?”

“Armed Robbery.”

“Guilty?”

“Nope.  My lawyer fucked me.”

- from The Shawshank Redemption

 

Buried in the news this past week was a compelling story that personifies the degree to which the men and women of Wall Street and the financial world continue to evade responsibility for the personal destruction of trillions of dollars worth of shareholders wealth, all the while continuing to collect millions of dollars in compensation as they simultaneously took bailouts from American taxpayers, and avoid prosecution for their criminally fraudulent  behavior.

“There is no individual liability in this case; there is no evidence that any individual is culpable.”

- Bank of America’s statement in a federal court filing

A U.S. District Court Judge thinks otherwise. 

When Bank of America (BoA) was in the process of acquiring Merrill Lynch after the financial meltdown late last year, it intentionally failed to disclose to it’s shareholders that millions of dollars in executive bonuses where being paid to Merrill Lynch executives.  When BoA tried to settle it’s litigation with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for $33 million this week over it’s corporate malfeasance, guess who they blamed?

Their lawyers! 

The federal judge overseeing the case viewed all of this with a healthy degree of skepticism, and questioned why the SEC was NOT prosecuting even one of the BoA executives for it’s failure to disclose this bonus payout arrangement to it’s shareholders, intimating that someone is responsible for leaving that important piece of information out of an SEC document regarding financial disclosures.  BoA executives say they authorized the filing of the disclosure upon the advice of staff and outside counsel, and that it was the lawyers that prepared the document.   The judge rejected the settlement and decided that all BoA had to do was waive attorney-client privilege  – - presumably so that an inquiry could be made to determine who advised BoA to file the document, what did the executives know (or should have known).

Now BoA is defiantly refusing to waive attorney-client privilege.  Why?

Sounds like their lawyers not only screwed BoA, they all now likely screwed themselves and one another.  

Oh damn, that pesky law of unintended consequences even applies to “really smart people”.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments