Archive for category Glenn Beck

Bill O’Reilly Claims Fox News NEVER Said You Could Go To Jail For Failing to Purchase Health Insurance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REALLY, O’Reilly?

Several nights ago you decided to take Senator Tom Coburn to task on national television for his recent comments regarding Fox News’ common use of disinformation to confuse voters.  So in the course of your interview, you challenged him specifically on the issue regarding whether Fox News ever disseminated the notion that anyone could go to jail for not buying health insurance under the Health Care Reform bill

You stated, and I quote, ““We researched on Fox News if anybody had ever said you’re going to jail if you don’t buy health insurance. Nobody’s ever said it.”

Well Bill, I suggest you hire some competent researchers, because the one’s you have must be hittin’ the bong in the back room.  There it is in black and white, lifted straight out of Fox News’ transcripts.  Read it and weep . . . and weep . . . and weep . . .

Bill.  Don’t you, Sean Hannity, Fox News, The PopeThe Vatican , and Dick Cheney just love this new digital age we are in?

I DO!

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Top Strategy in Fox News’ Playbook Exposed By Republican Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK)

 

Re-elect Republican Senator Tom Coburn.

That’s right.  I said it.  Vote for a Republican.  Even one I often disagree with.

You know why? 

Because Tom Coburn has shown the courage of his convictions to not allow his constituents to be misled, or operate under false assumptions regarding misinformation that Fox News regularly feeds it’s viewers.  Nor have them be deluded into believing that Nancy Pelosi is somehow loathsome merely because she is the Democratic Speaker of the House.

In a recent Town Hall meeting back in his home state of Oklahoma, Senator Coburn summarily dismissed a statement by one of his supporters that you could be put in jail for not buying health insurance under President Obama’s newly-passed Health Care Reform Bill, and openly criticized Fox News for its irresponsible dissemination of this kind of nonsense to it’s viewers:

 “The intention is not to put any one in jail. That makes for good TV news on FOX but that isn’t the intention . . . [w]hat we have to have is make sure we have a debate in this country so that you can see what’s going on and make a determination yourself.”

When mentioning Speaker Pelosi by name, the crowd began to hoot and make personal attacks against her.  In response, Senator Coburn admonished his supporters, lecturing them on the finer points of civility by saying this:

“Come on now. She is nice – how many of you all have met her? She’s a nice person . . . [j]ust because somebody disagrees with you doesn’t mean they’re not a good person . . . I’ve been in the senate for five years and I’ve taken a lot of that, because I’ve been on the small side –- both in the Republican Party and the Democrat Party . . . [s]o don’t catch yourself being biased by FOX News that somebody is no good.”

The context of his speech was the current debate over extending unemployment benefits, and his opposition to Speaker Pelosi’s policy of not providing current funding for the proposal – thus increasing the deficit.  Whether you agree with his position on this – and I do not – I respect his willingness to not personalize the issue.

WOW!

A Republican teaching his constituents to think for themselves?  To not take everything they hear or read at face value?  That is both laudable and courageous.  And it earns my respect as much as any Democrat’s position on policies.  Especially in the current political environment.  Senator Coburn seems less interested in pandering to Fox News’ liberal use of the most common form of invalid argumentation:  Argument Ad Hominem, otherwise known as attacking the speaker instead of addressing the issue.  

Under the rules of formal debate, it is an unacceptable technique designed to appeal to emotion rather than logic.  In other words, Coburn correctly is calling out Fox News for it’s unconscionable attempts to persuade its viewers with labels and shameful lies, rather than with valid facts and reasoning.

Argument Ad Hominem is the most misused form of argumentation in American politics – and one that when elevated to irrational and vicious proportions, can lead to violence.  Simply put, if you do not agree with one of my arguments, address it directly.  Do not try and divert attention to my politics by attacking me personally, insinuating or saying that I am a Socialist, or a Liberal, or a lawyer.  That does not make my argument any less valid, and in fact, completely invalidates your response.

In the legal arena, there is an old saying:

“If you don’t have a case, abuse the witness.”

RIGHT, FOX NEWS?

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Obama and Democrats Played Republicans on Healthcare?

karma1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now the blame game begins about how Health Care Reform got passed. 

You are just going to love this one . . .

William Saletan reports today in Slate.com that the Bipartisan Health Care Summit organized by the Whitehouse and attended by the President and party leaders on February 25, 2010 , was in fact a total ruse orchestrated by President Obama to set-up the Republicans; Saletan cites accounts from four different media outlets who quote anonymous Democratic aides that “paint a picture of deception” as follows:

“Obama never believed he could persuade Republicans. He had already decided the shape of the bill. He called the meeting to create an illusion of outreach, put Republicans on the spot, discredit their ideas, and embolden Democrats.”

Oh, Horror of Horrors!  How sinister of  President Obama.  You know they say he is one Hell of a poker player.  Republicans should have known just how shrewd and conniving this beast was when they sat down at the table with him.  Obama went “all in”, and the Repubs folded.  How could he do this to them?

 The Republicans spent over a year trying to play Obama and the Democrats like a fiddle, and in the end, it was the Republicans who got played?  Hee Hee Hee.

KARMA BABY.  KARMA. 

Hey Repubs:  I think God does have a sense of humor.

, , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Teabaggers Are Tards!

Teabaggers use teabagger term first

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TEABAGGER ANTI-STIMULUS PROTEST AT WHITEHOUSE ON 2-27-09

 

OK.

Let’s analyze this Tard logic.

1)  Teabaggers (members of the American Tea Party) are so incensed that Rachael Maddow calls them by that name – sarcastically referencing the sexually-perverted act - that they have filed 1,239 Indecency complaints with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)against MSNBC (subsidiary cable network of parent company NBC), the broadcaster of The Rachael Maddow Show.

2)  The Teabaggers were the first ones to reference the term for political purposes in their February 27, 2009 anti-stimulus protest in front of the Whitehouse (see 2/27/09 post on web containing the picture above).

3)  So now their politically-correct sensitivity is insulted?

Including the Teabaggers Chief Tard, Sarah Palin? 

Hail to the Chief.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment

Wizards of Moronic Destruction (WMD) in Louisiana Watergate Have Assured Senator Landrieu’s Re-election

James O'Keefe

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Well if you are too young to remember the Watergate scandal, it almost tore America apart at the seams.  In fact, our country has never been as close to a Constitutional crisis as it was back in 1974, when President Richard Nixon was serving his second term in office.  With impeachment proceedings looming, Nixon was forced to resign as President of the United States for his participation in the Whitehouse’s cover-up of a burglary of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) offices in the Watergate office building in Washington, D. C. by Republican operatives at the direction of staff members of the Nixon Administration.

This is certainly not to insinuate that anything as remotely sinister as the Watergate scandal crimes against the country took place down in Louisiana near the end of January.  However, there are some very strange similarities that cannot be overlooked in respect to the Watergate burglars and the perpetrators of this political criminal escapade in Louisiana.

First, in both cases at least one of the men had a relatively cozy relationship to a U.S. intelligence agency.   E. Howard Hunt was a former C.I.A. officer, and one of the Whitehouse operatives who planned and helped execute the break-in of the offices of the DNC.  In the present case, it was reported today that Stanley Dai was the assistant director of the Intelligence Community Center of Academic Excellence program at Trinity Washington University, a small Catholic college in Washington D.C.,  – a program completely funded by the National Intelligence Agency.  Moreover, Dai was listed as the principle contact  for a symposium that featured officials of the National Intelligence Council, the National Counterterrorism Center, and the C.I.A. 

Second, in both cases one of the participants has a “relationship” to a federal law enforcement agency.  In Watergate, it was the still-infamous G. Gordon Liddy, a former F.B.I. agent who assisted Hunt in the planning and execution of the burglary.  In the Louisiana case, one of the participants is Robert Flanagan, the son of Shreveport-based acting U.S. Attorney Bill Flanagan.

Third, it should come as no irony that in each of these cases the actors were low-level political hacks obviously trying to infiltrate offices of Democratic party members and engage in politically-motivated espionage in order to win an election.  It should not be lost on anyone that for these petty criminals, democracy is far too dangerous to be left in the hands of the your political opponents.

Finally, the participation in the Louisiana case by one of the principles in the political “sting operation” to discredit ACORN - a molehill that looks bigger than a mountain to Glenn Beck’s deranged mind – should give a whole new meaning to political karma.

To James O’Keefe:  a word of advice - acting like a big pimp when you are just a little political whore will eventually catch up with you.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Jon Stewart Eviscerates Fox News’ Viewers For Drinking the Bong Water

Informed News Media Viewership

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just kidding . . . 

That was a shameless attempt to get Jon Stewart to reference this blog.  On last night’s The Daily Show (TDS), in a segment called The Blogs Must Be Crazy , Stewart lampooned the blogosphere’s use of certain words – particularly “eviscerates” – to describe how strongly some media talk show hosts respond to one another when critiquing their respective competitors.

Jon Stewart’s appearance on The O’Reilly Factor has created quite a buzz this week, and whatever you think of either Stewart or Bill O’Reilly, their willingness to appear on one another’s shows is quite refreshing, with a spirited but civil discourse taking place between the two of them.  I suppose the one irony in the show was O’Reilly’s cheap shot at Daily Show viewers by referring to them as “stoned slackers” – when surveys have routinely shown that they are some of the best informed news audiences.  

It comes as no surprise that ”stoned slackers” would actually be every bit as informed as Fox News viewers, and are probably significantly smarter than Fox News’ talk show hosts – even when they are “lit up”.  If Daily Show viewers ever watched Fox News - which they are way too smart to do – wonder what they would think?

Man I wish I could get ahold of whatever theses dudes are smoking, because that must be some really high-grade  SH!T” . . . or . . . . Dudes, you are not supposed to drink the bong water.”

bush_bong

, , , , ,

No Comments

President Obama: Yes! It’s The Economy, Stupid.

 It's the Economy Stupid

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

President Obama has been beyond a huge disappointment. 

The reasons for his significant failure in the first year of his Presidency are varied, and yesterday I read a very insightful essay on MSN Money by Paul B. Farrell of the Wall Street Journal’s Market Watch   that hones in on a number of opportunities Obama could have seized upon as a result of the financial collapse that would have allowed him to increase the already significant political capital that he possessed on the day of his inauguration.   

In the simplest parlance - he blew it!

This writer will have more to say on the specifics of those issues, but that is for another entry posted here on this blog.  More importantly for purposes of today’s entry, I offer a humble mea culpa for my idealistic beliefs that this man was really different from all the others.  I pride myself on being intellectually honest enough to admit that I was wrong about Obama’s willingness to effectuate any substantial change in this country with acumen and finesse.  How stupid of me to believe that he would really first focus on the one issue that was at the forefront of every voter’s mind since November, 2007 - one year before the 2008 election – and has continuously been the leading issue for the past two years.

In the words of James Carville’s famous political mantra for the 1992 Clinton campaign, “It’s The Economy Stupid!”

Suddenly this week, the President finally has this incredible revelation that he needs to place the issue of the economy, as well as attend to financial system reform, at the top if his agenda?  President Obama – how could you and all of these ostensibly intelligent people you surrounded yourself with have possibly missed that most salient and readily available information?  Why did you not immediately address the failure of our economic system in it’s present form to serve the interests of its citizens, and redress the ongoing transgressions by the men who were responsible for single-handedly wrecking the underpinnings of American Capitalism?  Why did you not implement substantial changes in how our economy is managed by imposing strict accountability, transparency and limitations on how the banking industry operated?  Why did you trust that these financial terrorists would not not rob the national treasury for their own personal gain, instead turning a blind eye to their obvious avarice and indifference to the economic welfare of the country?   Why did you not instruct Tim Geithner and the Treasury Department to direct the lending institutions to focus all of that available financial capital at shoring-up businesses and home values in order to preserve the essential assets so critical to the future of the American people, instead of bailing out these corrupt and incompetent financial giants?  Why did you not utilize the available “bully pulpit” to chastise both your party and the Republicans for their unwillingness to use their legislative powers to immediately reign in these predatory financial giants, because of the “river of dirty money” (campaign contributions) running through Washington, D.C.?

Instead, you choose to ignore the over-arching importance of these matters, and wasted all of your hard-earned political capital by rubber-stamping the bailouts, and then embarking on an agenda of reforming an equally complex and failed health care system – a pathway that was historically fraught with political pitfalls and epic battles against powerful wealthy corporate interests.   Anyone studying the history of American health care reform would know that simple fact.

Now, before any of you Conservatives start hooting and hollering in celebration of my criticism of the President, or my ”concession” regarding his obvious failures, let me inform you that your intellectual dishonesty for the past decade has been nothing short of shameful.  Lest you think you are blameless, your willful ignorance of, as well as refusal to admit, the abysmal failure of your leaders, party, spokespersons, and Conservative media to improve the status of this country and its people - particularly Bush, Cheney, Palin, McCain, Mitch McConnell, John Boehner, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Fox News, etc. - is completely reprehensible, and gives you no standing to believe that you have something to crow about.

You don’t.

In fact, part and parcel of Obama’s inability to effectuate change has been due to the ”political noise” you either countenenced or participated in during the election campaign in the Fall of 2008 as a substitute for reasoned and measured dialogue about what was wrong with this country.  Labeling him a Muslim – when nothing is further from the truth, and cheering on those who claimed that he was “palling around with terrorists“, willfully distracted the American public from what was really at stake for the future of our country.  Many of you continued to increase the sound of that chorus to a deafening roar after he was elected with the most utter nonsense – first claiming he was not a citizen in spite of the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, as well as charging that he is a Socialist, hellbent on destroying the foundations of this nation, when in fact his predecessors that you supported, as well as their corrupt political business cronies, had already virtually accomplished that objective. 

In so much as you have fostered and perpetuated these opinions by either expressed belief or passive silence as to the truth, you are partially responsible for the demise of this republic.  Your behavior is utterly Un-American.  It is an absolute certainty that history will be far less kind to you than it will be to President Obama.

Shame on you.

And if you happen to choke to death on your teabags, oh well . . .

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Fox News’ Hiring of Sarah Palin Makes Our Founding Fathers Want a Mulligan on Freedom of the Press

palin-beck-2012-mccoy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At famous cemeteries all up and down the East coast, you can hear their contorted bodies rolling over in their graves at night.  Our founding fathers are watching Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin invoke their names on Fox News as though these two are patriots to the principles of truth and freedom. 

In her interview with Beck on Tuesday, Palin even went so far as to make a poorly veiled attempt at comparing herself to George Washington, stating that “he was almost reluctant to serve as president, too . . . that is who you need to find to serve in government . . . those who you know will serve for the right reasons because they’re reluctant to get out there and seek a limelight and seek the power. They’re doing it for people. ”

Notice her use of the word “too“, as in “I also am reluctant, but I will do it for my country”?

You can be certain those comments make Thomas Jefferson and James Madison almost wish they could take a mulligan on the 1st Amendment’s clause respecting Freedom of the Press.  After all, even men as intelligent as they were could have never envisioned two demagogues like Beck and Palin both employed by the same network.  Think about it.  Could you ever in your wildest imagination have believed there would be this much self-aggrandizement polished and wrapped under the guise of news and opinions?

Well thank goodness, Jefferson and Madison were also intelligent enough to know that most Americans would not listen to shameless frauds like Beck and Palin.  Our founding fathers had enough faith in the wisdom of the American people to know that the principles of reason and logic would prevail over the false words and deeds from even the most duplicitous and disingenuous hypocrites that were in our midst. 

That’s called Freedom of Thinking.

, , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments